5۔ مائکروفکشن (دلہن ) ۔ عقیل عباس
مائکروفکشن (دلہن ) : ۔ عقیل عباس
تنقیدی جائزہ: علی زیرک ــ دلہن (مائکروفکشن)
آج کی رات خدا کی روح مجھ میں حلول کرے گی
اور وہ چاہتا کہ تم اپنا آپ میرے حوالے کر کے اس کی زوجیت میں آ جاؤ
اور یہ بتاؤ کیا تم یہ سمجھتی ہو کہ میں جھوٹ بول رہا ہوں یا کہ یہ خواہش خدا کی نہیں؟
نہیں فادر
تو پھر ٹھیک ہے آج رات تیار رہنا، کچھ داسیاں تمہیں تیار کر کے خدا کی دلہن بنا دیں گی
اور پھر اس نے دیکھا - - - - -
خدا کی روح ایک ایسے انسان میں حلول کر آئی تھی جو اس کے پاؤں کے بوسے لیتا تھا
تب اس نے جانا کہ وہ خدا سے عظیم تر ہے
حالانکہ وہ کہتے تھے کہ عورت ازلی گنہ گار ہے
اور اگر وہ ازلی گنہ گار ہوتی تو خدا اس شخص کے منہ سے، جو خود کو اس کا نائب کہتا ہے، اس کی جائے خفی کے بوسے لیتا!
ہر گز نہیں
پھر ہوا میں معلق اُس کے پاؤں کی طرح اس کی گردن بھی نخوت سے تن گئی
آج کی رات خدا اس کی دسترس میں تھا
تنقیدی جائزہ :۔
Narrative Strategy
کی سطح پر اس مائکروفکشن میں Apigram کی لٹریری ڈیوائس کو برتا گیا ہے۔
اوربیانیے کو Demfamiliarize کیا گیا ہے یعنی اس میں Allienation Effect کا اصول اپنایا گیا ہے جو بنیادی طور پر ڈرامے سے منسوب تھا۔ جس طرح برصغیر میں محدثین کی خدمات حدیث: تاریخی و تجزیاتی جائزہ
After the Prophet r the Muslims all over the world associate themselves with him by following his pious deeds and acting upon his sayings (Hadith). The Muslims of the sub-continent have been very zealous in this respect and have done great job in this regard. In the subcontinent, the sayings of the Holy Prophet reached with Islam during the era of pious caliphs. In those days, according to some traditions, 25 companions of the Holy Prophet ﷺ Sahaba (R. A) and 42 Tabe-ien (those who had seen the Sahaba R. A i-e their successors) came to India and preached Islam. This preaching was continued by later Muslims and the rulers like Mohammad Bin Qasim and Mehmood Ghaznavi. The services of great Muhaddeseen (narrators and illustrators of the sayings of the Holy Prophet r like Musa Bin Yaqoob, Yazid Bin Abi Kabsha, Abu Musa Israeel Bin Musa and Abu Hafs Rabi Bin Sabih are note worthy. They provided local people the knowledge of Hadith. These scholars earned fame and prestige by their great works in this field. Shah Waliuallah wrote Mussffa and Maswwa, in subcontinent there are great many institutions like Jamia Salfiya Faisalabad, Jamia Ashrafia Lahore, Jamia Naeemia Lahore, Khair- ul-Madaras Multan, Jamia Mohammadia Gujranwala, Dar-ul-Hadith Delhi and Jamia Salfiya Banaras to teach the knowledge of Hadith. Effect of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Glycemic Control, Compared to Usual Care in Type 2 Diabetic Patients at the Family Medicine Clinic, Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi
Background: Globally, the magnitude of disease burden associated with diabetes is high. Poor glycemic control contributes greatly to this burden, especially in the occurrence of related complications. The value of Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is evident in literature, and has been recommended as a way of optimizing glycemic and metabolic control and averting early onset of diabetes complications. Usual care involves spontaneous sharing of information during medical consultations without planned structure or defined time frame. In the African setting, the effect of DSME, and how it compares to usual care, is yet to be fully explored. Objective: To compare the effect of a structured Diabetes Self-Management Education programme to usual care, in type 2 diabetic patients managed at the family medicine clinic, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi (AKUHN). Methods: This was an open label randomized clinical trial carried out at the outpatient family medicine clinic of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. One hundred and forty type 2 diabetic patients were recruited, 70 patients randomly allocated to either group using a computer generated sequence. DSME was applied in the intervention arm by Certified Diabetic Educators (CDE) while the control group received usual care from the family medicine doctor. The primary outcome, glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c) was used to determine the mean difference in blood glucose control after 6 months of follow up. Secondary biomedical outcomes included blood pressure, body weight, height and BMI. Data was analyzed using the per protocol analysis. STATA version 12 software was used. Difference in means of the outcome variables was compared using the student t-test. Results: A total of 96 patients (69%) completed the study, 55 in the DSME group and 41 in the usual care group. The mean (± SD) age of all the patients at baseline was 48.8 (± 9.8) years with a mean (± SD) HBA1c of 9.9% (± 1.76). After 6 months of follow up, no significant difference was noted in the primary outcome (HBA1c) between both groups, with a mean difference of 0.37 (95% CI - 0.45 to 1.19; P = 0.37). DSME also made no remarkable change in any of the secondary outcome measures. Conclusion: Overall, DSME did not show significant improvements in the primary or secondary biomedical outcomes. This may suggest that a well-trained family physician offering diabetes education may be just as good as a DSME trained educator. Further studies are however required to support this finding, particularly